Services

EHR/EMR Integration Solutions

Connect your product to Epic, Oracle Health (Cerner), athenahealth and other EHRs through the access path each workflow needs: FHIR R4 APIs, SMART on FHIR apps, HL7 v2 feeds or C-CDA documents.

EHR integration is rarely one API. A clinician-facing app launches from the chart with SMART on FHIR, admissions and results arrive as HL7 v2 messages through an interface engine, transitions of care still travel as C-CDA documents, and scheduling or billing often needs the vendor's proprietary API. I help HealthTech teams choose the right path for each workflow and build it against Epic (open.epic, Epic on FHIR and Vendor Services), Oracle Health/Cerner (Millennium FHIR R4 APIs registered through code Console) and athenahealth (certified FHIR R4 plus the athenaOne APIs). The work covers the parts that decide the schedule as much as the code: vendor registration, the customer's security review, per-site activation and configuration, validation on the customer's non-production environment, and the monitoring that keeps a live interface trustworthy.

Schedule a Consultation

30+

EHR Integrations Delivered

50+

Message Types Supported

99.9%

Uptime on Production Interfaces

What I Deliver

Bidirectional Data Exchange

I build integrations that not only pull data from EHR systems but also push data back, enabling workflows like order entry, result delivery, and document submission from external applications.

Secure Data Pipelines

Every integration I build uses encrypted connections, validated message parsing, and secure credential management to protect PHI throughout the data exchange process.

C-CDA Document Exchange

I implement Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture parsing and generation for continuity of care documents, discharge summaries, and other clinical document types required for Meaningful Use.

Real-Time Event Processing

Using HL7v2 triggers and FHIR subscriptions, I build integrations that react to clinical events in real time, such as patient admissions, lab result availability, and medication orders.

Interface Monitoring & Alerting

Every integration includes monitoring dashboards and alerting for message failures, latency spikes, and data quality issues so problems are caught before they impact clinical workflows.

Why Work With Me

Eliminate Manual Data Entry

Automated data exchange removes the need for staff to manually copy information between systems, reducing errors and freeing clinicians to focus on patient care.

Maintain Data Integrity

Robust validation, deduplication logic, and error handling ensure that clinical data remains accurate and consistent across all connected systems.

Meet Regulatory Requirements

Proper EHR integration is essential for Meaningful Use, the 21st Century Cures Act information blocking rules, and CMS interoperability mandates. I help translate the applicable requirements into interface controls and test evidence.

Related Case Studies

Related reading and services

Debugging a message? Open the free HL7 parser to see each segment and field labelled. It runs in your browser.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which EHR systems do you have experience integrating with?

I have direct hands-on experience integrating with Epic, Cerner (Oracle Health), Allscripts, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, and several specialty-specific EHR systems. I work with both HL7v2 TCP/IP interfaces and modern FHIR REST APIs depending on what the EHR vendor supports and what the use case demands.

What is the difference between HL7v2 and FHIR integration?

HL7v2 is a message-based protocol that has been the backbone of healthcare integration for decades. It uses pipe-delimited messages sent over TCP/IP connections. FHIR is a modern RESTful API standard that uses JSON or XML resources. HL7v2 is still dominant for real-time clinical event feeds like ADT and lab results, while FHIR is increasingly used for patient-facing apps, CDS Hooks, and bulk data access. I help clients choose the right approach for each use case.

How do you handle message failures and data quality issues?

I implement comprehensive error handling at every stage of the integration pipeline. This includes message validation against expected schemas, dead-letter queues for messages that fail processing, automatic retry logic with exponential backoff, and alerting that notifies the support team when intervention is needed. I also build data quality dashboards that track metrics like message throughput, error rates, and processing latency.

Can you integrate with multiple EHR systems simultaneously?

Yes. Many healthcare organizations operate in environments with multiple EHR systems across different departments, facilities, or acquired practices. I design integration architectures that normalize data from disparate EHR sources into a unified format, often using an integration engine like Mirth Connect as the central hub.

How long does EHR integration take?

It depends less on the code than on the gates around it. Building against a vendor sandbox is usually the fastest part. The calendar is set by vendor registration, the customer's security and legal review, the site's analysts activating and configuring your app or interface, validation on their non-production environment with realistic data, and their change-control window for go-live. I give you an estimate once the access path, the number of sites and the customer's process are known, and I plan the work so that each gate starts as early as possible.

What are the main EHR integration API options?

There are five common paths. FHIR R4 REST APIs with SMART on FHIR authorization, which certified US EHRs must provide, suit patient apps, clinician apps launched from the chart and backend services. HL7 v2 feeds through an interface engine carry real-time events such as admissions, orders and results. C-CDA documents cover transitions of care and HIE exchange. Bulk FHIR export delivers population-level data as NDJSON files. Vendor proprietary APIs, such as the athenaOne APIs or Epic's additional interfaces, cover workflows the certified API does not, often scheduling and other writes. Most production integrations combine two of them.

Do I need a separate integration engine or can you build direct integrations?

It depends on the complexity and number of integrations. For a single point-to-point connection, a direct integration is often simpler and more cost-effective. For organizations managing multiple interfaces across multiple systems, I recommend an integration engine like Mirth Connect to centralize message routing, transformation, and monitoring. I can advise on the best approach for your specific situation.

Need to Connect Your App to an EHR System?

Whether you are building a new integration from scratch or troubleshooting an existing one, I can help you get reliable clinical data flowing between your systems.